Nudum Pactum The term ‘Nudum Pactum’ has been derived from Latin terminology which means a naked agreement. The adage denotes an agreement made without any consideration. As per law, a contract is only enforceable when it is inclusive of the basic requirement of consideration. Consideration is defined as a promise to pay money, valuable things, or any other perk as discussed by the parties engaged in the contract or agreement. Where there is no consideration that is a nudum pactum, and hence such a contract is neither enforceable nor valid. A nudum pactum might be made verbally or in writing. Since these agreements are unenforceable, they may not be pursued in court. This indicates that these agreements do not come under the categories of agreements that can lead to legal action. Such agreement may constitute a modification or exemption to an existing duty. The contract, on the other hand, is regarded as legitimate if it is sealed. Furthermore, some contracts,...
Best Books For RJS Exams According to the experts, the selection of the right RJS Books helps students to cover all the topics according to the latest RJS Exam Syllabus. We have compiled a list of the Best book for Rajasthan Judiciary Exam. India’s constitutions by S.Chand Rajasthan Junior Legal Officer by Global Publishing House Judicial Services Examinations By Lexis Nexis The Constitution of India By Universal Law Publishing (P.M. Bakshi) Judicial Service Examinations English Language By Delight Law Publishers Solved Papers of Judicial Service Preliminary Examination By Singhal Law Publications Rajasthan Judicial Service Examination Solved Papers By Global Publishing House Compulsory English By A.P. Bhardwaj Objective General Hindi By Chand What Are The Best Places To Purchase RJS Books? Rajasthan Judiciary Exam books are easily available in local bookstores. If you do not get them there, then look for places near the court of the region. There are small bookstores that s...
Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India [1978 AIR 597] Introduction Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India case is regarded as the landmark judgment in the expansion of Article 21 and the interpretation of Fundamental Rights. Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution were further strengthened after this case and gave new expansion to Article 21. Before the Maneka Gandhi case, Article 21 only protected the Right to Life and Personal Liberty against the executive branch’s arbitrary actions, not from legislative action. However, this case also added protection against legislative activities. Background of Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India After the imposition of emergency, Indira Gandhi’s image was tarnished, she lost the election of 1977, and Bhartiya Janta Party was in power. During this time, her daughter-in-law, Maneka Gandhi, was running a magazine named Surya Magazine. She wanted to travel abroad regarding some democratic or human rights-related speech. While she wanted to travel, her ...
Comments
Post a Comment